![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
I watched an interesting episode of Penn & Tellers show "Bullshit" on recycling. They spent a lot of time talking about a paper (summed up here) called "The Eight Myths of Recycling " which explains how the recycling movement has a ton of bad ideas behind it. Some points I found very interesting:
The amount of new growth that occurs each year in forests is more than 20 times the number of trees consumed by the world each year for wood and paper.
In virtually all cases, recycling materials requires more energy and produces more pollution than acquiring new materials and manufacturing with them.
There is exactly one material that is more profitable and environmentally friendly to recycle: aluminum. That's why a homeless guy will pick up aluminum cans and won't take plastic, newspapers, etc.
The recycling industry is supported by an estimated $8 billion in government subsidies.
The amount of new growth that occurs each year in forests is more than 20 times the number of trees consumed by the world each year for wood and paper.
In virtually all cases, recycling materials requires more energy and produces more pollution than acquiring new materials and manufacturing with them.
There is exactly one material that is more profitable and environmentally friendly to recycle: aluminum. That's why a homeless guy will pick up aluminum cans and won't take plastic, newspapers, etc.
The recycling industry is supported by an estimated $8 billion in government subsidies.
no subject
I felt like it didn't make much sense that recycling wasted more resources than trashing the old and producing the new.
And I didn't think about old growth vs new growth forests, which I really should have picked up on on my own. V. embarrased.